7 Prominent Signs of Junk Processed Information in Food and Nutrition

7 Prominent Signs of Junk Processed Information in Food and Nutrition

In today's world, we are inundated with a never-ending stream of information, especially when it comes to food and nutrition. It's hard to separate fact from fiction, truth from myth, and science from pseudoscience. It's crucial to recognize junk processed information and steer clear of it to avoid making poor health decisions. Here are seven prominent signs of junk processed information in food and nutrition:

It's too good to be true

If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Any nutrition claims that promise miraculous and immediate results with little to no effort are likely to be false. For instance, a product that claims to help you lose 10 pounds in a week without dieting or exercising is most probably a gimmick.

Extreme language

Junk information in food and nutrition often uses extreme and sensational language to draw attention. Claims like "the ultimate superfood," "miracle cure," or "perfect food" should raise red flags. Science relies on quantification rather than buzz words.

It's based on a single poor study

One study doesn't make it conclusive. Research needs to be replicated and studied by other researchers before it becomes a widely accepted fact. Don't trust nutrition claims based on just one study. The rare exception to this might be a highly controlled double-blind placebo controlled study with a decent to large sample size. However, that's not how most nutrition studies are currently conducted.


Junk processed information tends to overgeneralize findings, often exaggerating and distorting research findings. For instance, saying that all carbs are bad, protein is the most satiating macronutrient, or all fat is unhealthy, is a classic example of overgeneralization.

Promotes personal opinions

Junk processed information is often based on personal opinions rather than scientific facts. Beware of nutritionists and bloggers that push their personal agendas rather than evidence-based practices. The plural of bad anecdotes can be a cult!

It's too complicated

Junk processed information in food and nutrition often includes overly complicated language, weak but intelligent sounding mechanistic evidence, and technical jargon that can be hard to understand. It's essential to look for information that is clear, concise, and easy to understand.

It's not supported by reputable sources

When it comes to nutrition, it's crucial to check your sources. Be wary of information that is pushed by biased writers and influential figures who have built an identity around a certain ideology or concept and isn't supported by reputable sources like government organizations, scientific journals, or peer-reviewed research.

In conclusion, it's vital to be able to distinguish junk processed information from credible sources of information when it comes to food and nutrition. By recognizing these seven signs, you can make better and informed choices about what to put in your body.

Dive Deeper with KG Food Company: Elevate your journey to better health with our Energy Pods or CocoZen, the world’s best almond chocolate spread, meticulously crafted for taste and wellness while building our food model and framework. Plus, join us on our acclaimed 'Energize, Explore, Enjoy Podcast,' where we delve deep into experiences through a scientific lens. Your support propels our vision forward – creating an in-house lab dedicated to pioneering nourishing foods for the future. With every purchase, you relish quality and we give back to our global community. Stay in touch with us by subscribing to our E3 digest & newsletter.